Results
Acoustic monitoring over the first eight months showed
that twenty-two of the translocated River Blackfish
survived and remained within the translocated reaches.
Five River Blackfish were not recorded after being
translocated. These fish may have not moved past a
receiver, rejected their tags, died or their tags failed.
Of the River Blackfish that were tracked, most fish
moved less than 100m, with two fish moving more than
1km. When stream flows increased, some fish moved
more frequently or over larger distances. One fish even
moved over 1.6 km – the longest distance recorded for
River Blackfish!
A few adult fish and no young fish were collected during
the electrofishing and fyke netting surveys in autumn
2016, while no adult or young fish were collected in
2017 and 2018, suggesting that the River Blackfish
failed to establish permanent, new home ranges and
reproduce. Factors which may explain results include:
• Adult fish stayed in the translocation reaches and
recruited, but adult and juvenile fish have not
been detected in surveys.
• The effect of stress related to translocation close
to the species’ spawning period, resulted in fish
not breeding.
• Not enough fish were translocated to obtain a
viable breeding population.
• Adult fish moved from the site when conditions
become unfavourable.
A severe drought in Coalition Creek about six months
after translocation resulted in the creek ceasing to flow,
with subsequent decreased dissolved oxygen and
increased water temperature. This poor water quality
may have caused translocated fish to leave the
reaches, and reiterates the need to carefully select
translocation sites with good instream and riparian
habitat in catchments not impacted by potential water
quality issues.
Key findings and next steps
This pilot study indicates that River Blackfish can be
translocated and will remain in translocated areas for at
least eight months. Translocation may represent one
tool that can contribute to restoration of River Blackfish
within their former range. Future remediation
approaches should consider using a larger number of
translocated fish and more suitable rehabilitation areas
that are resilient to drought. It would also be worthwhile
investigating the feasibility of a captive breeding and
stocking program for River Blackfish in Victoria.
A Partnership
This work was funded through the Recreational Fishing
Grants Program. West Gippsland CMA managed the
project, ARI undertook the fish research and monitoring,
and the Leongatha Angling Club contributed to site
selection and project support.
Contact
Justin.O’Connor@delwp.vic.gov.au
References
O’Connor, J., Amtstaetter, F., Ayres, R., Koster, W. and
Bowler, M (2016) Translocation of River Blackfish – Tarwin
River pilot study. An unpublished client report for West
Gippsland Catchment Management Authority. ARI
Fig 2: Acoustic receivers placed instream (Photo: ARI)
© The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that
licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as
author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including
the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of
Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence,
visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
ISBN 978-1-76077-105-8 (print), 978-1-76077-106-5 (pdf/online)
Disclaimer
This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees
do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate
for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or
other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this
publication.